4.6 Article

Early Metabolomic Markers of Acute Low-Dose Exposure to Uranium in Rats

期刊

METABOLITES
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo12050421

关键词

uranium; low dose; acute; contamination; metabolomics; diagnostic; N-methyl-nicotinamide; tryptophan

资金

  1. IRSN [30181523]
  2. Orano

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metabolomics changes in rats following acute low-dose uranium exposure were studied to identify early biomarkers and altered metabolic pathways. The study found that low doses of uranium lead to time-based non-toxic biological effects, which can be used for identifying early and delayed exposure markers and for predicting uranium exposure.
Changes in metabolomics over time were studied in rats to identify early biomarkers and highlight the main metabolic pathways that are significantly altered in the period immediately following acute low-dose uranium exposure. A dose response relationship study was established from urine and plasma samples collected periodically over 9 months after the exposure of young adult male rats to uranyl nitrate. LC-MS and biostatistical analysis were used to identify early discriminant metabolites. As expected, low doses of uranium lead to time-based non-toxic biological effects, which can be used to identify early and delayed markers of exposure in both urine and plasma samples. A combination of surrogate markers for uranium exposure was validated from the most discriminant early markers for making effective predictions. N-methyl-nicotinamide, kynurenic acid, serotonin, tryptophan, tryptamine, and indole acetic acid associated with the nicotinate-nicotinamide and tryptophan pathway seem to be one of the main biological targets, as shown previously for chronic contaminations and completed, among others, by betaine metabolism. This study can be considered as a proof of concept for the relevance of metabolomics in the field of low-dose internal contamination by uranium, for the development of predictive diagnostic tests usable for radiotoxicological monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据