4.7 Article

Consumer perception and use intention for household distributed photovoltaic systems

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101895

关键词

Environmental concern; Innovativeness; Photovoltaic system; Use intention; Energy consumption; Energy policy

资金

  1. Shantou University Research Fund [STF20011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the factors influencing Chinese residents' use intention for household PV system, and found that environmental concern and innovativeness were positively associated with use intention, mediated by perceived benefits and harm. The monthly electricity consumption of residents also moderated part of these associations.
Given the importance of promoting renewable energy, the Chinese government has enacted policies to encourage residents to install and use household distributed photovoltaic (PV) systems. However, only a few studies investigated factors influencing residents' use intention for household PV systems. The present study therefore investigated the influence of Chinese residents' environmental concern and innovativeness on their use intention for household PV system, as well as the mediating effects of perceived benefits and harm of household PV system in this process. Furthermore, the moderating role of residents' monthly electricity consumption in the abovementioned association was also examined. Questionaire data from 400 Chinese participants in Zhejiang Province were used for analysis. Results from structural equation modeling suggested positive associations between environmental concern and use intention, and between innovativeness and use intention, through the mediating of perceived benefits and harm. Residents' monthly electricity consumption also moderate part of the associations. Based on the results, this paper calls on the government to regulate the safety standard of household PV nationwide to enhance social confidence. Conspicuous consumption, which comes with traditional customs, should also be reduced.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据