4.7 Article

On the influence of decommissioning an area thermal substation in a district heating system on heat consumption and costs in buildings - Long term field research

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101870

关键词

District heating; Area thermal substation; Individual thermal station; Weather controller; Energy efficiency

资金

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the results of several years of field research on the modernization of existing district heating systems in 13 multi-family buildings. The study showed that decommissioning bifunctional area substations and using compact heat exchanger thermal stations with weather automation can significantly improve energy efficiency.
Modernization of the existing district heating systems is a necessary activity to improve their energy efficiency in the field of generation, distribution and use of the heat. This paper presents the results of several years of field research carried out for 13 multi-family buildings supplied from the district heating network. The benefits associated with the decommissioning of a bifunctional area substation and the use of compact heat exchanger thermal stations with weather automation in each analyzed building were demonstrated. The use of a weather controller in the area substation contributed to a reduction in the corrected heat consumption in a heating system by 23.6% the following year. As a result of the reconstruction of the area substation into individual stations in the buildings, the actual heat consumption for domestic hot water demand decreased by an average of 29% over 10 years, and the annual unit heat consumption for this purpose decreased by an average of 0.13 GJm(-3). Considering the influence of the district heating system modernization on the corrected annual heat consumption for space heating, a reduction of heat consumption by 17.8% in the building B4, 20.4% in the building B7 and 23% in the building B13 was obtained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据