4.6 Article

A Nutrient-Based Cellular Model to Characterize Acetylation-Dependent Protein-Protein Interactions

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.831758

关键词

bromodomain; lysine acetylation; chromatin; ATP citrate lyase; interactome mapping; acetyl-CoA; acetate; functional proteomics

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [1304616-2017]
  2. Leader's Opportunity Funds from the Canada Foundation for Innovation [37454, 41426]
  3. FRQS doctoral scholarship
  4. Cancer Research Center-Universite Laval
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To study BRD-dependent interaction networks on chromatin, researchers established a series of acetate supplementation-dependent histone acetylation cell lines.
Cellular homeostasis requires the orderly expression of thousands of transcripts. Gene expression is regulated by numerous proteins that recognize post-translational modifications-in particular, the acetylation of lysine residues (Kac) on histones. In addition to affecting the general condensation state of the chromatin, acetylated histones act as anchor points for bromodomain (BRD)-containing adapter proteins. BRDs are the primary Kac reader domains in humans, and proteins containing them act as chromatin scaffolds that organize large networks of interactions to regulate transcription. To characterize BRD-dependent interaction networks, we established cell lines in which histone acetylation is dependent on acetate supplementation. To do this, we used genome editing to knock out ATP citrate lyase (ACLY), the enzyme responsible for converting citrate to oxaloacetate and acetyl-CoA in the cytoplasm and nucleus. In our cellular model, removing acetate from the culture medium resulted in the rapid catabolism of acetylated histones to restore the nucleocytoplasmic acetyl-CoA pool. Here we report the use of our new model in functional proteomics studies to characterize BRD-dependent interaction networks on the chromatin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据