4.5 Article

Arterial vasodilation drives convective fluid flow in the brain: a poroelastic model

期刊

FLUIDS AND BARRIERS OF THE CNS
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12987-022-00326-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [CBET 1705854]
  2. NIH [R01NS078168]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The movement of fluid in and out of the brain plays a vital role in clearing metabolic waste. This research investigates the mechanisms behind fluid movement and suggests that arteriolar dilations can drive fluid circulation in the brain, especially during sleep-like conditions. The study highlights the importance of convective flow in the extracellular space for waste clearance.
The movement of fluid into, through, and out of the brain plays an important role in clearing metabolic waste. However, there is controversy regarding the mechanisms driving fluid movement in the fluid-filled paravascular spaces (PVS), and whether the movement of metabolic waste in the brain extracellular space (ECS) is primarily driven by diffusion or convection. The dilation of penetrating arterioles in the brain in response to increases in neural activity (neurovascular coupling) is an attractive candidate for driving fluid circulation, as it drives deformation of the brain tissue and of the PVS around arteries, resulting in fluid movement. We simulated the effects of vasodilation on fluid movement into and out of the brain ECS using a novel poroelastic model of brain tissue. We found that arteriolar dilations could drive convective flow through the ECS radially outward from the arteriole, and that this flow is sensitive to the dynamics of the dilation. Simulations of sleep-like conditions, with larger vasodilations and increased extracellular volume in the brain showed enhanced movement of fluid from the PVS into the ECS. Our simulations suggest that both sensory-evoked and sleep-related arteriolar dilations can drive convective flow of cerebrospinal fluid not just in the PVS, but also into the ECS through the PVS around arterioles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据