4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Clustering distributed Energy Storage units for the aggregation of optimized local solar energy

期刊

ENERGY REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 405-410

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.043

关键词

Clustering; K-means; Energy Storage; Scheduling; Prosumers

资金

  1. FEDER Funds through COMPETE program
  2. National Funds through (FCT) [UIDB/00760/2020, PTDC/EEI-EEE/28967/2017, CEECIND/02887/2017, SFRH/BD/144200/2019]
  3. ANI (project GREEDi)
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/EEI-EEE/28967/2017, SFRH/BD/144200/2019] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Active communities are emerging to create a cleaner and safer energy system. The uncertainty of main resources calls for flexibility from the demand side. This study focuses on the impact of Energy Storage Systems (ESS) in an active community, utilizing clustering analysis to identify patterns and highlighting the importance of ESS from both Aggregator and active consumer perspectives.
Active communities are emerging thanks to the necessity of creating a cleaner and safer energy system. The growing concern regarding climate change urges a solution to remove fossil fuels from the production equation. The Distributed Generation (DG) technologies are presented as a substitute, but the main resources' behavior is highly uncertain. Flexibility from the demand side is needed. In this way, the authors resort to mixed-integer linear programming optimization to schedule the active resources introduced by the Smart Grid concept: DG, Demand Response programs, and Energy Storage Systems. In this study, the last one is the focus where the impact of these technologies in an active community is analyzed and discussed. The authors performed a clustering method to identify patterns on Energy Storage System (ESS) profiles, finding the optimal number of clusters first. The results show the importance of ESS from both Aggregator and active consumer perspectives. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据