4.6 Article

A Strategy for Gene Knockdown in Dinoflagellates

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10061131

关键词

dinoflagellate; knockdown; morpholino; translation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dinoflagellates are unicellular protists with unique nuclear features and genetic regulation at the transcriptional level. The initiation factor eIF4E plays a crucial role in gene expression. Researchers successfully delivered fluorescently-tagged morpholinos into the cytosol of dinoflagellate cells to achieve specific knockdown of eIF4E.
Dinoflagellates are unicellular protists that display unusual nuclear features such as large genomes, condensed chromosomes and multiple gene copies organized as tandem gene arrays. Genetic regulation is believed to be controlled at the translational rather than transcriptional level. An important player in this process is initiation factor eIF4E which binds the 7-methylguanosine cap structure (m7G) at the 5 '-end of mRNA. Transcriptome analysis of eleven dinoflagellate species has established that each species encodes between eight to fifteen eIF4E family members. Determining the role of eIF4E family members in gene expression requires a method of knocking down their expression. In other eukaryotes this can be accomplished using translational blocking morpholinos that bind to complementary strands of RNA, therefore inhibiting the mRNA processing. Previously, unmodified morpholinos lacked the ability to pass through cell membranes, however peptide-based reagents have been used to deliver substances into the cytosol of cells by an endocytosis-mediated process without damaging the cell membrane. We have successfully delivered fluorescently-tagged morpholinos to the cytosol of Amphidinium carterae by using a specific cell penetrating peptide with the goal to target an eIF4e-1a sequence to inhibit translation. Specific eIF4e knockdown success (up to 42%) has been characterized via microscopy and western blot analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据