4.6 Article

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Resistance in Salmonella Strains Isolated from Food, Animal and Human Samples between 2017 and 2021 in Southern Italy

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10040812

关键词

Salmonella; Italy; S. Kentucky; S. Typhimurium; monophasic variant of Typhimurium; S. Derby; S. Infantis; antimicrobial resistance; MDR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Salmonella enterica is a common cause of foodborne infection worldwide, especially in Italy. A study on the antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in Apulia and Basilicata provides a focused perspective on the region, revealing high resistance to several antibiotics and the need for further research and action in antibiotic management.
Salmonella enterica is one of the most common causes of foodborne infection in the world, and the most common one in Italy. Italy collaborates with the other EU member states to survey the antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella on a large scale. This study on the situation in Apulia and Basilicata provides a more focused point of view on the territory, and anticipates the data reported in future Italian reports. Antimicrobial resistance was detected using the MIC detection method, with EUVSEC (R) plates, on the strains collected between 2017 and 2021. The results of serotyping showed that Salmonella Infantis is the serovar that has increased the most over time in veterinary samples, while Salmonella Tyhimurium and its monophasic variant are the most isolated in human samples. The results of the antimicrobial resistance study comply with European data, showing high resistance to quinolones, tetracyclines, ampicillin and trimethoprim, and low resistance to colistin and cephems. The significant exception was that all strains were resistant to sulphametoxazole. The presence of MDRs, which was 85% in veterinary and 77.4% in human strains, often included critically important antibiotics, which is a sign that more study and action is needed to manage the use of antibiotics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据