4.7 Article

Bioactive Compound Profiling of Olive Fruit: The Contribution of Genotype

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox11040672

关键词

antioxidant; oleuropein; oleocanthal; verbascoside; alpha-tocopherol; squalene; sterols; olive fruit; olive cultivars; genotype effect

资金

  1. European Union [645595]
  2. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [645595] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the bioactive compounds of 61 different international olive cultivars, revealing significant variations in the levels of phenols, tocopherols, squalene, and sterols among the studied cultivars. The findings highlight the diversity in content levels of these important compounds among different olive cultivars.
The health, therapeutic, and organoleptic characteristics of olive oil depend on functional bioactive compounds, such as phenols, tocopherols, squalene, and sterols. Genotype plays a key role in the diversity and concentration of secondary compounds peculiar to olive. In this study, the most important bioactive compounds of olive fruit were studied in numerous international olive cultivars during two consecutive seasons. A large variability was measured for each studied metabolite in all 61 olive cultivars. Total phenol content varied on a scale of 1-10 (3831-39,252 mg kg(-1)) in the studied cultivars. Squalene values fluctuated over an even wider range (1-15), with values of 274 to 4351 mg kg(-1). Total sterols ranged from 119 to 969 mg kg(-1), and total tocopherols varied from 135 to 579 mg kg(-1) in fruit pulp. In the present study, the linkage among the most important quality traits highlighted the scarcity of cultivars with high content of at least three traits together. This work provided sound information on the fruit metabolite profile of a wide range of cultivars, which will facilitate the studies on the genomic regulation of plant metabolites and development of new olive genotypes through genomics-assisted breeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据