4.7 Review

Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress and Cell Death in Podocytopathies

期刊

BIOMOLECULES
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom12030403

关键词

podocytopathies; mitochondrial oxidative stress; reactive oxygen species (ROS); antioxidant defense; cell death

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81961138007, 81974096, 81770711, 81873602]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2018YFC1314000]
  3. Program for HUST Academic Frontier Youth Team [2017QYTD20]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Podocytopathies are kidney diseases driven by podocyte injury. This review highlights the crucial role of mitochondrial oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of podocytopathies and its relationship with cell death in podocytes. Exogenous antioxidants can protect podocytes from damage. The review aims to identify new targets for improving the treatment of podocytopathies.
Podocytopathies are kidney diseases that are driven by podocyte injury with proteinuria and proteinuria-related symptoms as the main clinical presentations. Albeit podocytopathies are the major contributors to end-stage kidney disease, the underlying molecular mechanisms of podocyte injury remain to be elucidated. Mitochondrial oxidative stress is associated with kidney diseases, and increasing evidence suggests that oxidative stress plays a vital role in the pathogenesis of podocytopathies. Accumulating evidence has placed mitochondrial oxidative stress in the focus of cell death research. Excessive generated reactive oxygen species over antioxidant defense under pathological conditions lead to oxidative damage to cellular components and regulate cell death in the podocyte. Conversely, exogenous antioxidants can protect podocyte from cell death. This review provides an overview of the role of mitochondrial oxidative stress in podocytopathies and discusses its role in the cell death of the podocyte, aiming to identify the novel targets to improve the treatment of patients with podocytopathies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据