Automated-Mechanical Procedure Compared to Gentle Enzymatic Tissue Dissociation in Cell Function Studies

The first step to obtain a cellular suspension from tissues is the disaggregation procedure. The cell suspension method has to provide a representative sample of the different cellular subpopulations and to maximize the number of viable functional cells. Here, we analyzed specific cell functions in cell suspensions from several rat tissues obtained by two different methods, automated-mechanical and enzymatic disaggregation. Flow cytometric, confocal, and ultrastructural (TEM) analyses were applied to the spleen, testis, liver and other tissues. Samples were treated by an enzymatic trypsin solution or processed by the Medimachine II (MMII). The automated-mechanical and enzymatic disaggregation procedures have shown to work similarly in some tissues, which displayed comparable amounts of apoptotic/necrotic cells. However, cells obtained by the enzyme-free Medimachine II protocols show a better preservation lysosome and mitochondria labeling, whereas the enzymatic gentle dissociation appears to constantly induce a lower amount of intracellular ROS; nevertheless, lightly increased ROS can be recognized as a complimentary signal to promote cell survival. Therefore, MMII represents a simple, fast, and standardized method for tissue processing, which allows to minimize bias arising from the operator's ability. Our study points out technical issues to be adopted for specific organs and tissues to obtain functional cells.

Automated summary

This study compared the automated-mechanical and enzymatic disaggregation methods for obtaining cell suspensions from various rat tissues. The results showed that these methods worked similarly in some tissues, but the enzyme-free Medimachine II protocol preserved lysosome and mitochondria labeling better, while the enzymatic gentle dissociation consistently induced a lower amount of intracellular ROS.