4.7 Article

Regulatory Crosstalk between Physiological Low O2 Concentration and Notch Pathway in Early Erythropoiesis

期刊

BIOMOLECULES
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom12040540

关键词

erythropoiesis; CD34(+) cells; HIF; Notch; progenitors; BFU-E; CFU-E; low O-2 concentration; differentiation

资金

  1. EFS-NVAQ

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Physiological low oxygen concentration promotes erythroid development and intersects with Notch signaling. HIF2 plays a critical role in early erythroid development, including Notch signaling.
Physiological low oxygen (O-2) concentration (<5%) favors erythroid development ex vivo. It is known that low O-2 concentration, via the stabilization of hypoxia-induced transcription factors (HIFs), intervenes with Notch signaling in the control of cell fate. In addition, Notch activation is implicated in the regulation of erythroid differentiation. We test here if the favorable effects of a physiological O-2 concentration (3%) on the amplification of erythroid progenitors implies a cooperation between HIFs and the Notch pathway. To this end, we utilized a model of early erythropoiesis ex vivo generated from cord blood CD34(+) cells transduced with shHIF1 alpha and shHIF2 alpha at 3% 02 and 20% O-2 in the presence or absence of the Notch pathway inhibitor. We observed that Notch signalization was activated by Notch2R-Jaggedl ligand interaction among progenitors. The inhibition of the Notch pathway provoked a modest reduction in erythroid cell expansion and promoted erythroid differentiation. ShHIF1 alpha and particularly shHIF2 alpha strongly impaired erythroid progenitors' amplification and differentiation. Additionally, HIF/NOTCH signaling intersects at the level of multipotent progenitor erythroid commitment and amplification of BFU-E. In that, both HIFs contribute to the expression of Notch2R and Notch target gene HES1. Our study shows that HIF, particularly HIF2, has a determining role in the early erythroid development program, which includes Notch signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据