4.5 Article

Occurrence of genes encoding spore germination in Clostridium species that cause meat spoilage

期刊

MICROBIAL GENOMICS
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000767

关键词

Clostridium; meat spoilage; spore germination

资金

  1. AgResearch Ltd Strategic Science Investment Fund (SSIF) [A25980]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the genomic conditions for germination of 37 representative Clostridium strains and finds that different species of Clostridium have different germination pathways, but the core components of the germination pathway are conserved.
Members of the genus Clostridium are frequently associated with meat spoilage. The ability for low numbers of spores of certain Clostridium species to germinate in cold-stored vacuum-packed meat can result in blown pack spoilage. However, little is known about the germination process of these clostridia, despite this characteristic being important for their ability to cause spoilage. This study sought to determine the genomic conditions for germination of 37 representative Clostridium strains from seven species (C. estertheticum, C. tagluense, C. frigoris, C. gasigenes, C. putrefaciens, C. aligidicarnis and C. frigdicarnis) by comparison with previously characterized germination genes from C. perfringens, C. sporogenes and C. botulinum. All the genomes analysed contained at least one gerX operon. Seven different gerX operon configuration types were identified across genomes from C. estertheticum, C. tagluense and C. gasigenes. Differences arose between the C. gasigenes genomes and those belonging to C. tagluense/C. estertheticum in the number and type of genes coding for cortex lytic enzymes, suggesting the germination pathway of C. gasigenes is different. However, the core components of the germination pathway were conserved in all the Clostridium genomes analysed, suggesting that these species undergo the same major steps as Bacillus subtilis for germination to occur.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据