4.7 Article

Synthesis of Poly(Hexamethylene Succinate-Co-Ethylene Succinate) Copolymers With Different Physical Properties and Enzymatic Hydrolyzability by Regulating the Ratio of Monomer

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.894046

关键词

aliphatic polyester; poly(hexamethylene succinate-co-ethylene succinate); enzymatic hydrolysis; cutinase; physical properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, varying the ratios of different components in copolymers allowed for control over its properties and enzymatic hydrolysis rates. The prepared copolyesters showed higher degradation rates compared to the corresponding homopolyesters, and the degradation rates were influenced by crystallinity, melting temperature, and hydrophobicity.
Poly(hexylene succinate) (PHS), poly(ethylene succinate) (PES), and their random copolyesters, poly(hexylene succinate-co-ethylene succinate) ((P(HS-co-ES)), were synthesized by melting polycondensation. Simply varying the ratios of HS/ES afforded control over the copolymer crystallinity, thermal and mechanical properties, wettability, and enzymatic hydrolyzability as shown by X-ray diffraction (XRD), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), tensile tests, and water contact angle (WCA) measurements. The enzymatic hydrolysis rates of all prepared copolyesters were higher than those of the corresponding homopolyesters. The hydrolysis rates were affected by crystallinity, melting temperature, and hydrophobicity of the copolyesters, and therefore, the degradation rates could be tuned along with the ES content. The library of copolymers prepared here with tunable degradation rates, ranging from HS-enriched to ES-enriched copolyesters, is promising for a variety of different applications. The P(HS-co-ES51) copolyester that did not fully degrade is particularly promising for use in long-term storage applications, whereas P(HS-co-ES13) and P(HS-co-ES76) that rapidly degrade are good for use in very short-term applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据