4.7 Article

A Bioreactor for 3D In Vitro Modeling of the Mechanical Stimulation of Osteocytes

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.797542

关键词

prostate cancer; osteocyte; bioreactor 3D cell culture; mechanotrasduction; osteoblast (OB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bone is a common metastatic site for prostate cancer, but the mechanism of interaction between the tumor and the bone microenvironment is not fully understood. In this study, a tunable bioreactor was developed to culture osteocyte cells and study their response to pressure. The results demonstrate that the bioreactor can mimic the mechanotransduction response of osteocytes, providing a useful tool for studying the mechanisms of osteocytes in bone health and disease.
The bone is a mechanosensitive organ that is also a common metastatic site for prostate cancer. However, the mechanism by which the tumor interacts with the bone microenvironment to further promote disease progression remains to be fully understood. This is largely due to a lack of physiological yet user-friendly models that limit our ability to perform in-depth mechanistic studies. Here, we report a tunable bioreactor which facilitates the 3D culture of the osteocyte cell line, MLO-Y4, in a hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP) scaffold under constant fluidic shear stress and tunable hydrostatic pressure within physiological parameters. Increasing hydrostatic pressure was sufficient to induce a change in the expression of several bone remodeling genes such as Dmp1, Rankl, and Runx2. Furthermore, increased hydrostatic pressure induced the osteocytes to promote the differentiation of the murine macrophage cell line RAW264.7 toward osteoclast-like cells. These results demonstrate that the bioreactor recapitulates the mechanotransduction response of osteocytes to pressure including the measurement of their functional ability in a 3D environment. In conclusion, the bioreactor would be useful for exploring the mechanisms of osteocytes in bone health and disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据