4.7 Review

Air Pollution Exposure Induces Vascular Injury and Hampers Endothelial Repair by Altering Progenitor and Stem Cells Functionality

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.897831

关键词

air pollution; particulate matter; cardiovascular disease; vascular injury; endothelial repair; endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extensive evidence indicates that air pollution exposure is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease development. Fine particulate matter, one of the main components of urban pollution, exerts adverse effects on the cardiovascular system through unknown mechanisms. This review provides an overview of the potential mechanisms by which air pollution hinders vascular repair by altering the functionality of stem cells and progenitor cells.
Extensive evidence indicates an association of air pollution exposure with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) development. Fine particulate matter (PM) represents one of the main components of urban pollution, but the mechanisms by which it exerts adverse effects on cardiovascular system remain partially unknown and under investigation. The alteration of endothelial functions and inflammation are among the earliest pathophysiological impacts of environmental exposure on the cardiovascular system and represent critical mediators of PM-induced injury. In this context, endothelial stem/progenitor cells (EPCs) play an important role in vascular homeostasis, endothelial reparative capacity, and vasomotor functionality modulation. Several studies indicate the impairment of EPCs' vascular reparative capacity due to PM exposure. Since a central source of EPCs is bone marrow (BM), their number and function could be related to the population and functional status of stem cells (SCs) of this district. In this review, we provide an overview of the potential mechanisms by which PM exposure hinders vascular repair by the alteration of progenitor and stem cells' functionality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据