4.7 Article

Recent Update on Retinoic Acid-Driven Initiation of Spermatogonial Differentiation

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.833759

关键词

Sertoli cell; germ cell; androgen receptor; retinoic acid; meiosis; spermatogenesis

资金

  1. University Grants Commission [F.30104/2015BSR]
  2. Department of Science and Technology [ECR/2018/000868]
  3. Science and Engineering Research Board, New Delhi, India [EMR/2017/004290]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This opinion article briefly reviews our current understanding on the RA-driven spermatogonial differentiation in murine testes, including the role of RA in the transition of spermatogonia types and the regulation of meiotic prophase.
Germ cells (Gc) propagate the genetic information to subsequent generations. Diploid (2n) Gc get transformed to specialized haploid (n) gametes by mitotic and meiotic divisions in adult gonads. Retinoic acid (RA), an active derivative of vitamin A (retinol), plays a critical role in organ morphogenesis and regulates the meiotic onset in developing Gc. Unlike ovaries, fetal testes express an RA-degrading enzyme CYP26B1, and thereby, male Gc fail to enter into meiosis and instead get arrested at G(0)/G(1) stage, termed as gonocytes/pro-spermatogonia by embryonic (E) 13.5 days. These gonocytes are transformed into spermatogonial stem/progenitor cells after birth (1-3 days of neonatal age). During post-natal testicular maturation, the differentiating spermatogonia enter into the meiotic prophase under the influence RA, independent of gonadotropic (both FSH and LH) support. The first pulse of RA ensures the transition of undifferentiated type A spermatogonia to differentiated A(1) spermatogonia and upregulates STRA8 expression in Gc. Whereas, the second pulse of RA induces the meiotic prophase by augmenting MEIOSIN expression in differentiated spermatogonia B. This opinion article briefly reviews our current understanding on the RA-driven spermatogonial differentiation in murine testes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据