4.7 Article

Sonic hedgehog is Essential for Proximal-Distal Outgrowth of the Limb Bud in Salamanders

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.797352

关键词

limb development; salamander; Sonic hedgehog; zone of polarizing activity (ZPA); BMS-833923; CRISPR-Cas9; cell proliferation; cell death

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the role of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling in the development of the forelimb in axolotls, showing that Shh is not only involved in limb patterning, but also directs the expansion and survival of limb progenitor cells. The study suggests that urodeles have evolved a unique mode of limb development compared to other tetrapods.
The developing forelimb has been a foundational model to understand how specified progenitor cells integrate genetic information to produce the tetrapod limb bauplan. Although the reigning hypothesis is that all tetrapods develop limbs in a similar manner, recent work suggests that urodeles have evolved a derived mode of limb dvelopment. Here, we demonstrate through pharmacological and genetic inactivation of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling in axolotls that Shh directs expansion and survival of limb progenitor cells in addition to patterning the limb across the proximodistal and antero-posterior axis. In contrast to inactivation of Shh in mouse or chick embryos where a humerus, radius, and single digit develop, Shh crispant axolotls completely lack forelimbs. In rescuing limb development by implanting SHH-N protein beads into the nascent limb field of Shh crispants, we show that the limb field is specified in the absence of Shh and that hedgehog pathway activation is required to initiate proximodistal outgrowth. When our results are examined alongside other derived aspects of salamander limb development and placed in a phylogenetic context, a new hypothesis emerges whereby the ability for cells at an amputation plane to activate morphogenesis and regenerate a limb may have evolved uniquely in urodeles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据