4.7 Review

Technical Review of Dual Inverter Topologies for More Electric Aircraft Applications

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TTE.2021.3113606

关键词

Inverters; Voltage; Topology; Modulation; Transportation; Switches; Voltage control; Dual inverter; floating bridge; multilevel inverters; space vector modulation; voltage regulation

资金

  1. Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program [807081]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article provides a comprehensive overview of different structures based on dual inverters and evaluates their performance in MEA applications. The key features of adopting dual inverter topologies are explicitly demonstrated, and a practical guideline for choosing suitable dual inverters for different MEA applications is provided.
Electric drives are an essential part of more electric aircraft (MEA) applications with ever-growing demands for high power density, high performance, and high fault-tolerant capability. High-speed motor drives can fulfill those needs, but their speeds are subject to the relatively low dc-link voltage adopted by MEA. The power inverters are thus expected to efficiently and effectively manage that limited voltage. A recently popular topology is represented by the dual inverters. They are featured by inherited fault tolerance, a high dc-link voltage utilization, and an excellent output power profile. This article aims to present a comprehensive review of different structures based on the dual inverter. To meet the stringent requirements of MEA applications, three performance aspects, including the voltage utilization, the inverter output quality, and the fault-tolerant capability, are selected. Based on the chosen performance metrics, the key features of adopting dual inverter topologies against other converter selections are explicitly demonstrated. Finally, a practical guideline for choosing suitable dual inverters for different MEA applications is provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据