4.8 Article

In-situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction texture analysis of tensile deformation of nanocrystalline NiTi wire in martensite state

期刊

APPLIED MATERIALS TODAY
卷 26, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101378

关键词

NiTi; Shape memory alloy; Martensitic transformation; Texture; Twinning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tensile deformation behavior of nanocrystalline NiTi wire in the martensite state was investigated, revealing its superelasticity and plastic deformation capability. The wire also exhibited the ability to refine the austenitic microstructure during the deformation process.
Tensile deformation of nanocrystalline superelastic NiTi wire in the martensite state at -90 degrees C until fracture was investigated by in-situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction texture analysis. The results were interpreted in terms of the activity of various transformation and deformation twinning modes. The strain components into the load axis as well as discontinuous rotations of the martensite crystal lattice due to activation of various twinning modes were calculated using an abstraction of ideal < hkl > fibre textured polycrystal and used to estimate the evolution of the martensite texture during the tensile test. It is found that the four fibre texture of selfaccommodated martensite transforms during the martensite reorientation stage in the tensile test into the sharp two fibre texture of the reoriented martensite reflecting its (001) compound twinned microstructure. Plastic deformation of martensite is claimed to proceed via peculiar deformation mechanism involving deformation twinning and kinking assisted by [100]/(011) dislocation slip. This deformation mechanism enables the nanocrystalline NiTi wire to deform at similar to 1 GPa engineering stress up to very large plastic strains similar to 50% with small strain hardening and brings about refinement of the austenitic microstructure of the NiTi wire down to nanoscale. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据