4.8 Article

Oxygen point defect stabilized metastable M3-phase VO2 films

期刊

APPLIED MATERIALS TODAY
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101474

关键词

Polymorph phase; M3-VO2 phase; Insulator-metal transition; Oxygen point defect

资金

  1. NRF Korea [NRF-2018R1D1A1B07045663, NRF-2021M3H4A6A02045432]
  2. Korea Basic Science Institute (National Research Facilities and Equipment Center) - Ministry of Education [2021R1A6C101A429]
  3. NRF Korea - Ministry of Education [NRF-2021R1A6A3A13045117]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxygen point defects play a crucial role in stabilizing the M3-VO2 phase, resulting in higher phase transition temperature and sharper phase transition characteristics.
Point defects can stabilize various metastable polymorph phases of complex oxides showing unique physical properties, even though their role in the stabilization of the metastable phase is unclear. In this study, we examined the role of oxygen point defects in stabilizing a polymorph M3-VO2 phase and its transition characteristics. Raman spectroscopy revealed the M3-VO2 phase at the ambient environment for the VO2 film grown on c-Al2O3 substrate at a higher oxygen flow rate. High-resolution XRD and DFT calculation exhibited that the M3-VO2 phase was stabilized by oxygen point defect incorporated into the tetrahedral interstitial site, the most stable defect type in the monoclinic VO2 system. The M3-phase had a higher IMT temperature and a sharper IMT than the MI-phase due to the decrease in interdimer hopping energy and the small energy barrier for the IMT by the slightly zigzag V-V chain. Furthermore, the temperature-dependent Raman spectra showed the unprecedented structural phase transition from the M3-VO2 phase to the R-phase without an intermediate state. Overall, these findings provide fundamental information on the role of oxygen point defects in realizing metastable polymorph phases in promising new technological materials. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据