4.4 Article

Telomere length and epigenetic clocks as markers of cellular aging: a comparative study

期刊

GEROSCIENCE
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 1861-1869

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11357-022-00586-4

关键词

Telomere length; Methylation age; Epigenetic clocks

资金

  1. Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health
  2. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [75N910D00024]
  3. Public Health Service from National Cancer Institute (NCI) [U24CA076518]
  4. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  5. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) [HHSH250201700006C]
  6. Office of Naval Research [N00014-20-1-2705, N00014-20-1-2832]
  7. Be the Match Foundation
  8. Medical College of Wisconsin
  9. National Marrow Donor Program
  10. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationship between telomere length and epigenetic clocks is limited to clocks reflecting phenotypic age. Telomere length shows significant associations with external epigenetic age acceleration, but not with intrinsic epigenetic age acceleration. Incorporating both telomere length and epigenetic clocks measurements may provide valuable insights into disease etiology and prognosis.
Telomere length (TL) and DNA methylation-based epigenetic clocks are markers of biological age, but the relationship between the two is not fully understood. Here, we used multivariable regression models to evaluate the relationships between leukocyte TL (LTL; measured by qPCR [n = 635] or flow FISH [n = 144]) and five epigenetic clocks (Hannum, DNAmAge pan-tissue, PhenoAge, SkinBlood, or GrimAge clocks), or their epigenetic age acceleration measures in healthy adults (age 19-61 years). LTL showed statistically significant negative correlations with all clocks (qPCR: r= - 0.26 to - 0.32; flow FISH: r= - 0.34 to - 0.49; p < 0.001 for all). Yet, models adjusted for age, sex, and race revealed significant associations between three of five clocks (PhenoAge, GrimAge, and Hannum clocks) and LTL by flow FISH (p < 0.01 for all) or qPCR (p < 0.001 for all). Significant associations between age acceleration measures for the same three clocks and qPCR or flow FISH TL were also found (p < 0.01 for all). Additionally, LTL (by qPCR or flow FISH) showed significant associations with extrinsic epigenetic age acceleration (EEAA: p< 0.0001 for both), but not intrinsic epigenetic age acceleration (IEAA; p > 0.05 for both). In conclusion, the relationships between LTL and epigenetic clocks were limited to clocks reflecting phenotypic age. The observed association between LTL and EEAA reflects the ability of both measures to detect immunosenescence. The observed modest correlations between LTL and epigenetic clocks highlight a possible benefit from incorporating both measures in understanding disease etiology and prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据