4.3 Article

Complete chloroplast genome of the medicinal herb Veronicastrum axillare (Sieb. et Zucc.) Yamazaki and the phylogenetic relationship analysis within the tribe Veroniceae

期刊

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA PART B-RESOURCES
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 783-785

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2022.2071651

关键词

Veronicastrum axillare; tribe Veroniceae; complete chloroplast genome; phylogenetic analysis

资金

  1. Research Project of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University [2021JKZKTS020B]
  2. Project of Quality Guarantee System of Chinese Herbal Medicines [201507002-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reported the complete chloroplast genome sequence of Veronicastrum axillare, providing basic genetic resources for investigating the evolutionary status of the species within the tribe Veroniceae. Comparative analysis revealed potential hotspots, which could serve as markers for population investigations in the Veroniceae tribe.
Veronicastrum axillare (Sieb. et Zucc.) Yamazaki is a traditional medical plant with versatile biological activities. Here, we reported the complete chloroplast genome sequence of V. axillare with a total length of 152,691 bp, containing two IR regions of 25,765 bp each, an LSC region of 83,559 bp, and an SSC region of 17,602 bp. The genome encodes 131 genes, including 85 protein-coding genes, 37 tRNAs, eight rRNAs, and one pseudogene (ycf1). The overall GC content is 38.3%, with the highest content of 43.31% in IR region. Comparative analysis revealed 4 potential hotspots among V. axillare and other Veroniceae plants, providing potential markers for population investigations in the tribe Veroniceae. A total of 56 simple sequence repeats were identified in V. axillare. Phylogenetic analysis indicated a sister relationship between V. axillare and V. sibiricum, suggesting a close genetic relationship between the two Veronicastrum species. Our results provide basic genetic resources for investigating the evolutionary status of V. axillare within the tribe Veroniceae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据