4.2 Article

Management of Relapsed/Refractory All with Inotuzumab During COVID-19. A Case Report

出版社

MATTIOLI 1885
DOI: 10.4084/MJHID.2022.043

关键词

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia; COVID-19; Inotuzumab; Remdesevir; Convalescent plasma

资金

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC), Metastases Special Program, Milan, Italy [21198]
  2. Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale (PRIN) Italia [2017PPS2X4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article describes the clinical history of a patient with concomitant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and COVID-19 infection. The patient developed Sars-CoV2 prior to treatment initiation, but was asymptomatic for COVID-19. Despite respiratory findings worsening during treatment, the patient achieved complete hematologic remission without completing the full treatment cycle and spontaneously developed anti-Sars-CoV-2 antibodies. After COVID-19 recovery, the patient underwent transplantation and achieved complete remission.
Management of patients with concomitant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and COVID-19 infection is challenging. We describe the clinical history of a 40-year-old male with relapsed B-common ALL who developed Sars-CoV2 prior to treatment initiation with inotuzumab. Since the patient was asymptomatic for COVID-19, the first dose of inotuzumab was administered, followed by remdesivir as prophylaxis. However, a worsening in respiratory findings led to a delay in administering the following doses of inotuzumab. Interestingly, even if the patient did not receive the full inotuzumab cycle, he achieved a complete hematologic remission: furthermore, he spontaneously developed anti-sars-COV2 antibodies. COVID-19 treatment also included convalescent plasma, leading to negativization of the viral load. The patient, after COVID-19 recovery, received a second full cycle of inotuzumab, underwent allogeneic transplantation, and is currently in complete hematologic and molecular remission, in good clinical conditions, five months from allograft.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据