4.7 Review

Agri-Environmental Indicators: A Selected Review to Support Impact Assessment of New EU Green Deal Policies

期刊

AGRONOMY-BASEL
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12040798

关键词

policy assessment; Green Deal; EU Common Agricultural Policy; scaled indicators; greening

资金

  1. Fondazione Cariplo [2019-3582]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to fill the gap in the selection methodology of agri-environmental indicators and assess the environmental impact of land use change in Northern Italy. The results reveal comparisons of original crops' impacts and significant knowledge gaps in the available literature.
Every intervention of planning, implementation, and monitoring of agricultural and agri-environmental policies requires assessment tools that should have the characteristics of relevance, completeness, interpretability, data quality, efficiency, and overlapping. Despite the extensive selection of bibliographies and numerous projects designed to develop agri-environmental indicators necessary for assessing the sustainability of new policies, it is difficult to have an integrated and updated set of indicators available, which can be an effective and practical application tool to assists policymakers, researchers, and actors in policy design, monitoring and impact assessment. Particularly, such a need is pressing to face the new environmental challenges imposed by the upcoming European Union Green Deal on the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) post 2023. This study, therefore, aims to fill this gap by proposing a selection methodology and different pools of agri-environmental indicators differentiated based on a scale approach (crop-farm-district-region). Furthermore, we have attempted to apply our approach by quantifying selected indicators for a specific evaluation necessity, represented in this case by an assessment of the environmental impact of land use change induced by CAP greening requirements in the Northern Italy context. Results of this validation show original crops' impacts comparison, but also highlight great knowledge gaps in the available literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据