4.7 Article

Effect of Harvest Date on Kernel Quality and Antioxidant Activity in su1 Sweet Corn Genotypes

期刊

AGRONOMY-BASEL
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12051224

关键词

sweet corn; maturation; kernel moisture; sugars; phytoglycogen; total phenols; DPPH

资金

  1. Centre of Excellence for Biodiversity and Molecular Plant Breeding, Zagreb, Croatia [KK.01.1.1.01.0005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the quality of sugary sweet corn hybrids and found that the taste of sweet corn is greatly influenced by kernel moisture and total sugars content, while its health properties are related to the content of total phenols and antioxidant activity. The optimal stage for harvesting sweet corn is at 17 days after pollination (DAP).
In order to achieve a high-quality product, sweet corn should be harvested at the optimal stage of maturity. The taste of sweet corn depends largely on the kernel moisture (KM) and total sugars (TS) content while its health properties are attributed to the content of total phenols (TPH) and antioxidant activity (AO). This study aimed to estimate quality in sugary (sul) sweet corn hybrids based on the maximum content of kernel chemical compounds and the content change during maturation. During two growing seasons, five harvests by year were made at 2-day intervals from 17 to 25 days after pollination (DAP). KM decreased among hybrids from 6.6% to 14% over an eight-day period, or 0.8% to 1.8% per day. TS content was the highest at 17 DAP (16.5-28.7 mg/g DW) and decreased during maturation from 27% to 67%. Hybrids differed significantly in TPH at 17 DAP (204.4-357.1 mg GAE/100 g DW). TPH change during maturation ranged from the no significant differences up to a 29.3% decrease. DPPH- radical scavenging activity ranged among genotypes from 52.5% to 74.9% inhibition at 17 DAP and significantly increased during maturation. A well-defined hybrid-specific harvest window is necessary to maintain kernel quality in su1 sweet corn.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据