4.5 Review

Consumption of whole grains and risk of type 2 diabetes: A comprehensive systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 1950-1960

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2811

关键词

diabetes mellitus; meta-analysis; systematic review; whole grain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study quantitatively summarized earlier findings on the association between whole grain intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). The results showed that a high intake of whole grain was associated with a lower risk of T2D. Each additional 50 grams of whole grain consumption per day was associated with a 23% reduced risk of T2D.
This study aimed to quantitatively summarize earlier findings on the association between whole grain (WG) intake and type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk. We searched related keywords on PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar up to October 2021. Prospective observational studies investigating the association between WG intake and risk of T2D were included. The random-effects model calculates the summary relative risks by contrasting categories and linear and nonlinear dose-response associations. Eleven prospective cohort studies, including 463,282 participants and 37,249 type 2 diabetes incidents, were analyzed. The pooled relative risk (RR) for the highest versus the lowest WG intake category indicated a 21% decrease in T2D risk (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-0.85, I-2 = 77%). Each additional 50 grams WG consumption per day was associated with a 23% reduced risk of T2D. The nonlinear association of WG and T2D revealed that 60 grams WG intake per day would give the highest benefit to prevent T2D (Pnonlinearity < 0.001). The findings were not affected by any individual study. No evidence of publication bias was documented. In conclusion, a high intake of WG was associated with a lower risk of T2D. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据