4.5 Article

Application of mixture design methodology for development of high antioxidant fruity functional beverage

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 2245-2254

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2834

关键词

essential oil; extract; functional beverage; mixture design; optimization

资金

  1. university of Tabriz

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three types of red fruit juice and three plant extracts were used to develop different functional beverages. Organoleptic analysis was used to determine the most acceptable fruit juice blend. The optimum fruit juice blend had high polyphenols, antioxidants, anthocyanin, and vitamin C content. The study also determined the optimum level of extracts and essential oil in the fruit juice blends.
Three red color fruit juice (pomegranate (PJ), barberry (BJ), and grape juice (GJ)) and three plant extracts (cardamom essential oil (CE), ginger extract (GE), and hibiscus solution (HS)) were used for the development of different functional beverages. Organoleptic analysis was done to detect the most acceptable fruit juice blend. The physicochemical properties of the samples including total phenols, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) inhibition percent, anthocyanin, flavonoid, and vitamin C content of optimum fruit juice blend (60% PJ/20% BJ/20% GJ) were 121.57 mu g gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/ml, 80.28%, 4.03 mg/L, 64.87 mg/100 ml, and 51.10 mg/100 ml, respectively. To determine the optimum level of extracts and essential oil (GE, CE, and HS) in fruit juice blends, the mixture design method was used and 14 runs (formulations) were obtained. In all formulations, samples containing HS had the highest content of antioxidant and active components and the statistical analysis indicated that the sample containing 0.5 CE/0.5 GE/1 HS (ml/100 ml) had the optimum content of antioxidant components. Thus, the results of this study introduce a functional drink possessing high polyphenols, antioxidants, anthocyanin, and vitamin C content.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据