4.4 Article

Late contralateral recurrence of retinal detachment in incontinentia pigmenti: A case report

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES
卷 10, 期 13, 页码 4171-4176

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4171

关键词

Incontinentia pigmenti; Bilateral; Retinal detachment; Shift code mutation; Vitrectomy; Case report

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Incontinentia pigmenti (IP) is a rare genetic disease with various manifestations, including ocular abnormalities such as retinal detachment (RD). We present a case of an 11-year-old girl with IP who had bilateral asymmetrical RD. The patient underwent vitrectomy and retinal laser treatment, resulting in visual acuity improvement and resolution of retinal abnormalities.
BACKGROUND Incontinentia pigmenti (IP) is a rare X-linked genetic disease. It mainly manifests as skin lesions and causes problems in the eyes, teeth, bones, and central nervous system. Of the various ocular manifestations, the most severe with difficult recovery is retinal detachment (RD). Here, we report an unusual case of bilateral asymmetrical RD. CASE SUMMARY We present the case of an 11-year-old Chinese girl with IP who complained of sudden blurring of vision in the left eye. At that time, she had been blind in her right eye for 4 years. RD with traction was observed in both eyes. A massive retinal proliferative membrane, exudation, and hemorrhage were seen in the left eye. We performed vitrectomy in her left eye. Her visual acuity recovered to 20/50, and her retina had flattened within 2 d after surgery. During the 3-mo follow-up, we performed retinal laser treatment of the non-perfused retinal area in her left eye. Eventually, her visual acuity returned to 20/32, and no new retinal abnormalities developed. CONCLUSION In patients with IP with fundal abnormalities in one eye, it is important to focus on the rate of fundal change in the other eye. RD in its early stages can be effectively treated with timely vitrectomy and laser photocoagulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据