4.6 Article

Methods for Continuous Blood Pressure Estimation Using Temporal Convolutional Neural Networks and Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition

期刊

ELECTRONICS
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics11091378

关键词

blood pressure; PPG; temporal convolutional networks; ensemble empirical mode decomposition

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62072296, 61672001]
  2. Sub-Project of CST Forward Innovation Project [18163ZT00500901]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used ensemble empirical mode decomposition and temporal convolutional network to process photoplethysmography signals and obtained more accurate diastolic and systolic blood pressure measurement results.
Arterial blood pressure is not only an important index that must be measured in routine physical examination but also a key monitoring parameter of the cardiovascular system in cardiac surgery, drug testing, and intensive care. To improve the measurement accuracy of continuous blood pressure, this paper uses photoplethysmography (PPG) signals to estimate diastolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and temporal convolutional network (TCN). In this method, the clean PPG signal is decomposed by EEMD to obtain n-order intrinsic mode functions (IMF), and then the IMF and the original PPG are input into the constructed TCN neural network model, and the results are output. The results show that TCN has better performance than CNN, CNN-LSTM, and CNN-GRU. Using the data added with IMF, the results of the above neural network model are better than those of the model with only PPG as input, in which the systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) results of EEMD-TCN are -1.55 +/- 9.92 mmHg and 0.41 +/- 4.86 mmHg. According to the estimation results, DBP meets the requirements of the AAMI standard, BHS evaluates it as Grade A, SD of SBP is close to the standard AAMI, and BHS evaluates it as Grade B.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据