4.6 Article

Innovative Hyperspectral Image Classification Approach Using Optimized CNN and ELM

期刊

ELECTRONICS
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics11050775

关键词

hyperspectral image classification; CNN; ELM; PSO; deep feature

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an innovative classification method IPCEHRIC that combines the advantages of enhanced PSO algorithm, CNN, and ELM to effectively extract features and improve classification accuracy for HRSIs. Experimental results show that IPCEHRIC demonstrates stronger generalization, faster learning ability, and higher accuracy in classifying HRSIs.
In order to effectively extract features and improve classification accuracy for hyperspectral remote sensing images (HRSIs), the advantages of enhanced particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, convolutional neural network (CNN), and extreme learning machine (ELM) are fully utilized to propose an innovative classification method of HRSIs (IPCEHRIC) in this paper. In the IPCEHRIC, an enhanced PSO algorithm (CWLPSO) is developed by improving learning factor and inertia weight to improve the global optimization performance, which is employed to optimize the parameters of the CNN in order to construct an optimized CNN model for effectively extracting the deep features of HRSIs. Then, a feature matrix is constructed and the ELM with strong generalization ability and fast learning ability is employed to realize the accurate classification of HRSIs. Pavia University data and actual HRSIs after Jiuzhaigou M7.0 earthquake are applied to test and prove the effectiveness of the IPCEHRIC. The experiment results show that the optimized CNN can effectively extract the deep features from HRSIs, and the IPCEHRIC can accurately classify the HRSIs after Jiuzhaigou M7.0 earthquake to obtain the villages, bareland, grassland, trees, water, and rocks. Therefore, the IPCEHRIC takes on stronger generalization, faster learning ability, and higher classification accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据