4.6 Article

Improving Cuff-Less Continuous Blood Pressure Estimation with Linear Regression Analysis

期刊

ELECTRONICS
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics11091442

关键词

ECG; PPG; pulse transit time; blood pressure; regression analysis

资金

  1. European Union [824984]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work investigates the use of regression techniques to estimate continuous blood pressure through pulse transit time and heart rate without the need for a cuff. The continuous monitoring of hypertension can greatly improve the prevention of cardiovascular diseases and provide valuable tools for patient care. The study introduces innovative methods for pre-processing and feature research, paving the way for continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring.
In this work, the authors investigate the cuff-less estimation of continuous BP through pulse transit time (PTT) and heart rate (HR) using regression techniques, which is intended as a first step towards continuous BP estimation with a low error, according to AAMI guidelines. Hypertension (the 'silent killer') is one of the main risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), which are the main cause of death worldwide. Its continuous monitoring can offer a valid tool for patient care, as blood pressure (BP) is a significant indicator of health and, using it together with other parameters, such as heart and breath rates, could strongly improve prevention of CVDs. The novelties introduced in this work are represented by the implementation of pre-processing and by the innovative method for features research and features processing to continuously monitor blood pressure in a non-invasive way. Currently, invasive methods are the only reliable methods for continuous monitoring, while non-invasive techniques measure the values every few minutes. The proposed approach can be considered the first step for the integration of these types of algorithms on wearable devices, in particular on those developed for the SINTEC project.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据