4.7 Review

Rule-breaking in terrestrial protected areas of sub-Saharan Africa: A review of drivers, deterrent measures and implications for conservation

期刊

GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02172

关键词

Drivers; Deviant behaviour; Narrative review; Rules; Sub-Saharan Africa; Terrestrial protected area

资金

  1. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  2. Society for Conservation Biology (SCB)
  3. University of Pretoria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nature conservation relies on rule adherence, but non-compliance with regulations poses a threat to protected areas. This review examines illegal biological resource-use in terrestrial protected areas of sub-Saharan Africa, focusing on the drivers behind deviant behavior and strategies to deter illegal activities. The study finds that poaching activity is the most common criminal behavior, with poverty being the primary driver of non-compliance, particularly in illegal bushmeat hunting. Additionally, resentment towards protected areas due to destructive wildlife behavior is a significant motivation. A combination of law enforcement and non-enforcement approaches is deployed to deter offenders. The review highlights the need for future studies to address the multidimensionality of PA transgression and explore other drivers of illegal activities for evidence-based conservation intervention design.
Nature conservation relies largely on peoples' rule adherence. Nevertheless, non-compliance with regulations threatens in situ conservation in nearly every protected area (PA) and remains an intractable issue. We reviewed the available published scholarly literature on non-compliant biological resource-use in terrestrial protected areas (TPAs) of sub-Saharan Africa. The focus is on two objectives, firstly, to disentangle the complex drivers behind the various types of deviant behaviour observed in these PAs, and secondly, to assess the strategies deployed on the ground to deter such illegalities. Using 72 selected journal articles published between 2001 and 2021, we recorded nine types of deviant behaviour or illegal resource extraction that were reported. Poaching activity overshadowed all other criminal behaviours. Drivers varied according to the type of crime perpetrated or resources targeted. Poverty was the most cited driver of non-compliance, particularly for illegal bushmeat hunting. PA resentment prompted by destructive errant wildlife was almost as strong a motivation as material poverty. To deter offenders from committing a crime, a combination of interventions, i.e., law enforcement and a spectrum of non-enforcement approaches, such as Reformed Poachers Associations, long-term research sites and resource-access agreements, were deployed. Our synthesis demonstrates that the growing sub-Saharan African literature on non-compliant biological resource-use in TPAs is dominated by bushmeat poaching drivers. Other motives for PA offences by border villagers are scarcely dealt with in the peer-reviewed literature. Future studies of wildlife crime need to address PA transgression multidimensionality, not just bushmeat poaching, to reveal further drivers of transgressive behaviour and ultimately allow for evidence-informed conservation intervention design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据