4.6 Article

Heat/PMS Degradation of Atrazine: Theory and Kinetic Studies

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr10050941

关键词

heat activation; PMS; atrazine; degradation mechanism; kinetics

资金

  1. Science and Technology Project of Sichuan Province [22ZDYF2880, 22YYJC3490]
  2. Open Fund of State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Synergetic Control and Joint Remediation for Soil & Water Pollution [GHBK-2021-004]
  3. School Level Project of Chengdu Technological University [2021ZR020, QM2021003, QM2021034, QM2021064, QM2021080]
  4. National Innovation Training Program for College Students [S202011116015, S202011116031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A more alkaline PB is more likely to promote the breakdown of ATZ through heat/PMS, while the PB alone has a more acidic effect on the PMS.
The degradation effect of heat/peroxymonosulfate (PMS) on atrazine (ATZ) is studied. The results show that the heat/PMS degradation for ATZ is 96.28% at the moment that the phosphate buffer (PB) pH, temperature, PMS dosage, ATZ concentration, and reaction time are 7, 50 degrees C, 400 mu mol/L, 2.5 mu mol/L, and 60 min. A more alkaline PB is more likely to promote the breakdown of ATZ through heat/PMS, while the PB alone has a more acidic effect on the PMS than the partially alkaline solution. HO center dot and SO4-center dot coexisted within the heat/PMS scheme, and ATZ quantity degraded by HO center dot and SO4-center dot in PB with pH = 7, pH = 1.7 similar to 1. HCO3- makes it difficult for heat/PMS to degrade ATZ according to inorganic anion studies, while Cl- and NO3- accelerate the degradation and the acceleration effect of NO3- is more obvious. The kinetics of ATZ degradation via heat/PMS is quasi-first-order. Ethanol (ETA) with the identical concentration inhibited ATZ degradation slightly more than HCO3-, and both of them reduced the degradation rates of heat/PMS to 7.06% and 11.56%. The addition of Cl- and NO3- increased the maximum rate of ATZ degradation by heat/PMS by 62.94% and 189.31%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据