4.6 Article

Investigating the Trade-Off between Design and Operational Flexibility in Continuous Manufacturing of Pharmaceutical Tablets: A Case Study of the Fluid Bed Dryer

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr10030454

关键词

pharmaceutical manufacture; uncertainty; operational flexibility; operational envelopes; modeling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61873042]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the trade-off between design and operational flexibility of a fluid bed dryer in the tablet manufacturing process. The study shows that different drying times have a significant effect on the process flexibility, with the optimal result obtained at 700 seconds. Flexibility is not affected by changes in flow rate, but only by changes in temperature. A black box model was used to demonstrate the methodology in a commercial setting where access to the full model equation set is often limited.
Market globalisation, shortened patent lifetimes and the ongoing shift towards personalised medicines exert unprecedented pressure on the pharmaceutical industry. In the push for continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing, processes need to be shown to be agile and robust enough to handle variations with respect to product demands and operating conditions. In this paper we examine the use of operational envelopes to study the trade-off between the design and operational flexibility of the fluid bed dryer at the heart of a tablet manufacturing process. The operating flexibility of this unit is key to the flexibility of the full process and its supply chain. The methodology shows that for the fluid bed dryer case study there is significant effect on flexibility of the process at different drying times with the optimal obtained at 700 s. The flexibility is not affected by the change in volumetric flowrate, but only by the change in temperature. Here the method used a black box model to show how it could be done without access to the full model equation set, as this often needs to be the case in commercial settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据