4.7 Review

Post-COVID Syndrome: The Research Progress in the Treatment of Pulmonary sequelae after COVID-19 Infection

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14061135

关键词

post-COVID syndrome; long COVID; inhalation therapy; post-COVID sequelae; post-COVID fibrosis; in vitro lung models

资金

  1. Italian Ministry for Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews the long-term consequences and aftereffects of COVID-19 infection and suggests potential management strategies. Severe cases of COVID-19 can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), causing pulmonary fibrosis and irreversible respiratory function impairment. Inhalation delivery of drugs directly to the lungs is preferred to minimize dosage and systemic side effects. Further research is needed to optimize these techniques and utilize in vitro models to study SARS-CoV-2 infection and its sequelae.
Post-COVID syndrome or long COVID is defined as the persistence of symptoms after confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, the pathogen responsible for coronavirus disease. The content herein presented reviews the reported long-term consequences and aftereffects of COVID-19 infection and the potential strategies to adopt for their management. Recent studies have shown that severe forms of COVID-19 can progress into acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a predisposing factor of pulmonary fibrosis that can irreversibly compromise respiratory function. Considering that the most serious complications are observed in the airways, the inhalation delivery of drugs directly to the lungs should be preferred, since it allows to lower the dose and systemic side effects. Although further studies are needed to optimize these techniques, recent studies have also shown the importance of in vitro models to recreate the SARS-CoV-2 infection and study its sequelae. The information reported suggests the necessity to develop new inhalation therapies in order to improve the quality of life of patients who suffer from this condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据