4.5 Article

Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of the Dynamic Performance of a Footbridge with Tuned Mass Dampers

期刊

JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING
卷 21, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000815

关键词

Human-induced vibrations; Footbridge; Tuned mass damper (TMD); TMD effectiveness; Random pedestrian traffic; Full-scale testing

资金

  1. Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents an evaluation of the dynamic behavior of a slender steel footbridge before and after the installation of two tuned mass dampers (TMDs). The results of the experimental study show that the damping devices lead to an increase of the effective damping ratio of the critical mode. Additional tests involving the structural vibrations induced by a limited number of persons revealed that the TMD units are effective in reducing the structural response. However, the obtained reduction highly depends on the type of human excitation. To verify the response of the footbridge for large groups and crowds, a comprehensive numerical analysis is performed. The results are compared to the response predicted by the procedures of the Setra and HiVoSS design guides. For the bridge without TMD units, a significantly higher structural response is predicted by the design guides; the bridge has a short span and is lightly damped, so the steady-state resonant conditions assumed in the design guides are not reached for pedestrians who cross the bridge at a normal walking speed. For the bridge with TMD units, the design guides predict a significantly lower structural response than do the more detailed numerical simulations because the critical mode is highly damped and no longer dominates the structural response. In addition, the effectiveness of the damping devices is considerably less than that expected on the basis of the corresponding increase in effective damping ratio because crowd-induced loading is near-harmonic and transient, not harmonic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据