4.6 Article

Satellite Glial Cells and Neurons in Trigeminal Ganglia Are Altered in an Itch Model in Mice

期刊

CELLS
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells11050886

关键词

sensory ganglion; glial fibrillary acidic protein; gap junction; calcium imaging; purinergic receptor

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation (ISF) [1297/18]
  2. United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF) [2019076]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research indicates that enhanced intercellular communications in sensory ganglia following nerve injury or inflammation may lead to abnormal neuronal activity, resulting in pain. Changes in both neurons and satellite glial cells (SGCs) in sensory ganglia may play a role in itch.
Itch (pruritus) is a common chronic condition with a lifetime prevalence of over 20%. The mechanisms underlying itch are poorly understood, and its therapy is difficult. There is recent evidence that following nerve injury or inflammation, intercellular communications in sensory ganglia are augmented, which may lead to abnormal neuronal activity, and hence to pain, but there is no information whether such changes take place in an itch model. We studied changes in neurons and satellite glial cells (SGCs) in trigeminal ganglia in an itch model in mice using repeated applications of 2,4,6-trinitro-1-chlorobenzene (TNCB) to the external ear over a period of 11 days. Treated mice showed augmented scratching behavior as compared with controls during the application period and for several days afterwards. Immunostaining for the activation marker glial fibrillary acidic protein in SGCs was greater by about 35% after TNCB application, and gap junction-mediated coupling between neurons increased from about 2% to 13%. The injection of gap junction blockers reduced scratching behavior, suggesting that gap junctions contribute to itch. Calcium imaging studies showed increased responses of SGCs to the pain (and presumed itch) mediator ATP. We conclude that changes in both neurons and SGCs in sensory ganglia may play a role in itch.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据