4.6 Review

Yeast Chronological Lifespan: Longevity Regulatory Genes and Mechanisms

期刊

CELLS
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells11101714

关键词

chronological lifespan; aging; yeast longevity; bioactive substances; pro-longevity factors

资金

  1. Laurus foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

S. cerevisiae plays a crucial role as a model organism in understanding mammalian biochemistry and molecular biology. The study of its chronological lifespan provides insights into age-related damage and longevity extension. It also serves as a model system to study macromolecular and cellular damage leading to diseases and investigate the effects of nutrients and dietary regimens on stress resistance and longevity.
S. cerevisiae plays a pivotal role as a model system in understanding the biochemistry and molecular biology of mammals including humans. A considerable portion of our knowledge on the genes and pathways involved in cellular growth, resistance to toxic agents, and death has in fact been generated using this model organism. The yeast chronological lifespan (CLS) is a paradigm to study age-dependent damage and longevity. In combination with powerful genetic screening and high throughput technologies, the CLS has allowed the identification of longevity genes and pathways but has also introduced a unicellular test tube model system to identify and study macromolecular and cellular damage leading to diseases. In addition, it has played an important role in studying the nutrients and dietary regimens capable of affecting stress resistance and longevity and allowing the characterization of aging regulatory networks. The parallel description of the pro-aging roles of homologs of RAS, S6 kinase, adenylate cyclase, and Tor in yeast and in higher eukaryotes in S. cerevisiae chronological survival studies is valuable to understand human aging and disease. Here we review work on the S. cerevisiae chronological lifespan with a focus on the genes regulating age-dependent macromolecular damage and longevity extension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据