4.6 Article

The Statin Target Hmgcr Regulates Energy Metabolism and Food Intake through Central Mechanisms

期刊

CELLS
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells11060970

关键词

body maintenance index; obesity; statins; mevalonate pathway; metabolism; feeding behavior; hypothalamus

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [2016-01088]
  2. Swedish Research Council [2016-01088] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals the significant role of central Hmgcr in regulating metabolism, feeding behavior, and insulin signaling, which in turn affects body size, lipid storage, and blood glucose levels, potentially influencing BMI.
The statin drug target, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR), is strongly linked to body mass index (BMI), yet how HMGCR influences BMI is not understood. In mammals, studies of peripheral HMGCR have not clearly identified a role in BMI maintenance and, despite considerable central nervous system expression, a function for central HMGCR has not been determined. Similar to mammals, Hmgcr is highly expressed in the Drosophila melanogaster brain. Therefore, genetic and pharmacological studies were performed to identify how central Hmgcr regulates Drosophila energy metabolism and feeding behavior. We found that inhibiting Hmgcr, in insulin-producing cells of the Drosophila pars intercerebralis (PI), the fly hypothalamic equivalent, significantly reduces the expression of insulin-like peptides, severely decreasing insulin signaling. In fact, reducing Hmgcr expression throughout development causes decreased body size, increased lipid storage, hyperglycemia, and hyperphagia. Furthermore, the Hmgcr induced hyperphagia phenotype requires a conserved insulin-regulated alpha-glucosidase, target of brain insulin (tobi). In rats and mice, acute inhibition of hypothalamic Hmgcr activity stimulates food intake. This study presents evidence of how central Hmgcr regulation of metabolism and food intake could influence BMI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据