4.6 Review

Tumor Budding in Gynecologic Cancer as a Marker for Poor Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Perspectives of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition

期刊

CANCERS
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061431

关键词

gynecologic cancer; tumor budding; prognosis; pathology; systematic review

类别

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2021R1I1A1A01060037]
  2. Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital Clinical Research Laboratory Foundation [UJBCRL202125]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1I1A1A01060037] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the role of tumor budding (TB) in gynecological cancers and found that TB is associated with poor survival outcomes. TB is related to epithelial-mesenchymal transition, microvessel density, and decreased hormone receptor expression. TB can be used as a poor prognostic marker for gynecologic cancers.
Simple Summary Tumor budding (TB) is an emerging prognostic marker in various cancers; specifically, its role is well established in colorectal cancer. There are very few studies on TB's role in gynecological cancers. Thus, we studied tumor budding relationships with gynecological cancers and tried to figure out its role in patient survival outcomes. Total eleven cohort studies (seven cervical and four endometrial cancers) were enrolled. TB showed a poor prognosis in terms of survival and clinicopathological parameters outcome. TB was related to epithelial-mesenchymal transition, microvessel density, and decreased hormone receptor expression. TB can be used as future prognostic marker in gynecologic cancers. This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance, assessment methods, and molecular features of tumor budding (TB). A literature search of Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and eleven cohort studies (seven cervical and four endometrial cancers) was conducted. Three assessment methods for TB involving 2009 patients were collected and constituted in the analysis. Our meta-analysis showed that TB was a marker of poor survival, regardless of the cancer origin site or assessment method (overall survival: hazard ratio [HR], 2.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.82-3.17; disease-free survival: HR, 3.32; 95% CI, 2.46-4.48). In endometrial cancers, TB is associated with the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, microvessel density, and decreased hormone receptor expression. Thus, we suggest TB as a poor prognostic marker for all gynecologic cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据