4.6 Article

A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Single Agent Efficacy and Optimal Combination Sequence of Everolimus and Pasireotide LAR in Advanced Thyroid Cancer

期刊

CANCERS
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112639

关键词

thyroid cancer; somatostatin receptor; everolimus; pasireotide; combination; medullary carcinoma; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

类别

资金

  1. Novartis Oncology [CRAD001LUS141T]
  2. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared resource of Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
  3. NIH/NCI [P30CA138292]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This randomized trial showed that the combination of everolimus and pasireotide-LAR is more effective in treating thyroid cancer compared to a single agent. Delayed use of this combination strategy appeared to be promising in achieving optimal efficacy.
Simple Summary Prior clinical studies showed modest activity for single agent everolimus and somatostatin analogues in different subtypes of thyroid cancer; the combination of everolimus and somatostatin analogue was synergistic in preclinical models of thyroid cancer. This randomized trial showed that the combination was more effective than a single agent and the sequence of single agent everolimus followed by the delayed combination of everolimus and pasireotide-LAR achieved the best efficacy and was the optimal combination strategy. Purpose: Aberrant mTOR pathway and somatostatin receptor signaling are implicated in thyroid cancer and offer potential therapeutic targets. We assessed the clinical efficacy of everolimus and Pasireotide long-acting release (LAR) in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Patients and methods: Adults with progressive MTC and DTC untreated or treated with no more than one systemic agent were eligible. The trial was designed to establish the most promising regimen and the optimal combination sequence. Patients were randomized to start treatment with single agent everolimus (10 mg QD; Arm A), pasireotide-LAR (60 mg intramuscular injection, Q4 weeks; Arm B), or the combination (Arm C). At initial progression (PFS1), patients on Arm A or B switched to the combination and continued until progression (PFS2). Efficacy was measured by RECIST criteria. Results: Study enrolled 42 patients: median age 65 years; female 17 (40.5%); White 31 (73.8%), African American 6 (14.3%), others 5 (11.9); DTC 32 (76.2%); MTC 10 (23.8%). There was no objective response by RECIST criteria across the three arms. Median and 1-year PFS1 rates were 8.3, 1.8, 8.1 months and 49.9%, 36.4%, 25.0% for Arms A, B, C, respectively. Median and 1-year PFS2 rates were 26.3, 17.5, 8.1 months and 78.4%, 70.0%, 25% for Arms A, B, C, respectively. The most frequent adverse events were anemia, stomatitis, fatigue, hyperglycemia, and hypercholesterolemia. Conclusions: The combination of everolimus and pasireotide-LAR showed promising efficacy over single agent. The delayed combination of everolimus and pasireotide-LAR following progression on single agent everolimus appeared intriguing as a combination strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据