4.6 Review

The HIF-1 alpha as a Potent Inducer of the Hallmarks in Gastric Cancer

期刊

CANCERS
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112711

关键词

gastric cancer; hypoxia; hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha; hallmarks of cancer

类别

资金

  1. Presidency of Turkey, Presidency of Strategy and Budget

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypoxia plays a crucial role in the heterogeneity of tumors, and HIF-1 alpha reinforces cancer hallmarks and enhances the aggressiveness of cancer cells in hypoxic niches. However, the understanding of the role of HIF-1 alpha in gastric cancer is limited, highlighting the need for further research.
Hypoxia is the principal architect of the topographic heterogeneity in tumors. Hypoxiainducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha) reinforces all hallmarks of cancer and donates cancer cells with more aggressive characteristics at hypoxic niches. HIF-1 alpha potently induces sustained growth factor signaling, angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and replicative immortality. Hypoxia leads to the selection of cancer cells that evade growth suppressors or apoptotic triggers and deregulates cellular energetics. HIF-1 alpha is also associated with genetic instability, tumor-promoting inflammation, and escape from immunity. Therefore, HIF-1 alpha may be an important therapeutic target in cancer. Despite that, the drug market lacks safe and efficacious anti-HIF-1 alpha molecules, raising the quest for fully unveiling the complex interactome of HIF-1 alpha in cancer to discover more effective strategies. The knowledge gap is even wider in gastric cancer, where the number of studies on hypoxia is relatively low compared to other well-dissected cancers. A comprehensive review of the molecular mechanisms by which HIF-1 alpha induces gastric cancer hallmarks could provide a broad perspective to the investigators and reveal missing links to explore in future studies. Thus, here we review the impact of HIF-1 alpha on the cancer hallmarks with a specific focus on gastric cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据