4.7 Review

In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Different Types of Dry Eye and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092349

关键词

diagnostic device; dry eye; in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM); inflammation; ocular surface; tear disorder; review

资金

  1. Singapore National Eye Centre
  2. National Medical Research Council\Clinician Scientist Award [\017\2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) is a useful complementary technique for clinical diagnosis of ocular surface disorders such as dry eye. However, there are limitations including small field of view and lack of standardization. With future advances in hardware and software, IVCM has the potential for further practical impact.
In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) imaging is increasingly popular in ocular surface disease diagnosis and management. We conducted a systematic review to update the use of IVCM in the diagnosis and treatment of dry eye and meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). A literature review was conducted on IVCM studies in MGD, dry eye disease, systemic disease causing dry eye, dry eye in glaucoma patients, contact lens-associated ocular conditions, graft-versus-host disease, and Sjogren's syndrome-related dry eye. The articles were identified through PubMed and a total number of 63 eligible publications were analyzed in detail. All primary research studies on confocal microscopy on dry eye and related conditions from 2017 onwards were included. The reports were reviewed for their contribution to the existing literature as well as potential biases and drawbacks. Despite limitations such as small field of view, lack of population-based norms, and lack of standardization of image acquisition, interpretation, and quantification, IVCM is useful as a complementary technique for clinical diagnosis in various ocular surface disorders related to dry eye. With advances in hardware and software in the near future, it has the potential for further practical impact.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据