4.7 Review

Refractive Outcomes of Non-Toric and Toric Intraocular Lenses in Mild, Moderate and Advanced Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092456

关键词

biometry; intraocular lens power calculation formula; keratoconus; refractive error; spherical equivalent

资金

  1. Finnish Eye Foundation
  2. Finnish Medical Foundation
  3. Finnish Ophthalmological Society
  4. Friends for the Blind
  5. Nissi Foundation
  6. Paulo Foundation
  7. Waldemar von Frenckell Foundation
  8. HUS Specific Catchment Area (ERVA) Clinical Research Grants [ERV499, ERV521, EVO116, EVO117, EVO315]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A systematic review and meta-analysis compared the refractive outcomes of non-toric and toric intraocular lenses in keratoconus patients. The study found that cataract surgery generally achieved satisfactory refractive results in mild-to-moderate keratoconus, but only a minority of eyes with advanced keratoconus achieved the desired refractive outcomes. The formula with keratoconus adjustment developed by Kane showed the best results across all stages of keratoconus.
Background: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the refractive outcomes of non-toric and toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) in keratoconus (KC) using different IOL power calculation formulas. Methods: A systematic search was conducted to identify studies that report on refractive outcomes of different IOL power calculation formulas in KC patients undergoing cataract surgery. Inclusion criteria were primary posterior chamber non-toric and toric monofocal intraocular lens implantation, data on the degree of KC, explicit mention of the formula used for each stage of KC, and the number of eyes in each category. We calculated and compared the absolute and mean prediction errors, percentage of eyes within 0.5 D and 1 D from target, and the weighted absolute prediction errors of IOL formulas, all were given for KC degrees I-III. Results: The bibliographic search yielded 582 studies published between 1996 and 2020, 14 of which (in total 456 eyes) met the criteria: three studies on non-toric IOL (98 eyes), eight studies on toric IOLs (98 eyes) and three studies of unknown separation between non-toric and toric IOLs (260 eyes). The lowest absolute prediction error (APE) for mild, moderate, and advanced KC was seen with Kane's IOL power formula with keratoconus adjustment. The APE for the top five IOL power formulas ranged 0.49-0.73 diopters (D) for mild (83-94%) of eyes within 1 D from the target), 1.08-1.21 D for moderate (51-57% within 1 D), and 1.44-2.86 D for advanced KC (12-48% within 1 D). Conclusions: Cataract surgery in eyes with mild-to-moderate KC generally achieves satisfactory postoperative refractive results. In patients with advanced KC, a minority of the eyes achieved spherical equivalent refraction within 1 D from the target. The Kane's formula with keratoconus adjustment showed the best results in all KC stages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据