4.8 Article

DIRECT-NET: An efficient method to discover cis-regulatory elements and construct regulatory networks from single-cell multiomics data

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abl7393

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [DMS1763272]
  2. Simons Foundation [594598]
  3. NIH [U01AR073159, P30AR07504, K01MH123896, U01DA053628]
  4. UCI ICS research exploration grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emergence of single-cell multiomics data provides unprecedented opportunities to study the transcriptional regulatory mechanisms controlling cell identity. DIRECT-NET, a machine-learning method based on gradient boosting, allows us to identify genome-wide cis-regulatory elements (CREs) and their relationship to target genes from single-cell data. DIRECT-NET substantially improves the accuracy of inferring CRE-to-gene relationships and reveals cell subpopulation-specific and dynamic regulatory linkages.
The emergence of single-cell multiomics data provides unprecedented opportunities to scrutinize the transcriptional regulatory mechanisms controlling cell identity. However, how to use those datasets to dissect the cis-regulatory element (CRE)-to-gene relationships at a single-cell level remains a major challenge. Here, we present DIRECT-NET, a machine-learning method based on gradient boosting, to identify genome-wide CREs and their relationship to target genes, either from parallel single-cell gene expression and chromatin accessibility data or from single-cell chromatin accessibility data alone. By extensively evaluating and characterizing DIRECT-NET's predicted CREs using independent functional genomics data, we find that DIRECT-NET substantially improves the accuracy of inferring CRE-to-gene relationships in comparison to existing methods. DIRECT-NET is also capable of revealing cell subpopulation-specific and dynamic regulatory linkages. Overall, DIRECT-NET provides an efficient tool for predicting transcriptional regulation codes from single-cell multiomics data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据