4.8 Article

Specific mesoderm subset derived from human pluripotent stem cells ameliorates microvascular pathology in type 2 diabetic mice

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abm5559

关键词

-

资金

  1. VSRC core grant [P30 EY003039]
  2. NIH, National Cancer Institute (NCI) [P30 CA082709]
  3. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [U54 DK106846]
  4. NIH [1S10D012270, U01TR001810, R01HL095993, N01 75N92020C00005]
  5. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [R01HL128827-01]
  6. NEI [EY012601]
  7. UAB High Resolution Imaging Facility
  8. [S10 RR026887]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) can differentiate into specific mesoderm cells and restore vascular dysfunction in diabetic mice.
Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) were differentiated into a specific mesoderm subset characterized by KDR(+)CD56(+)APLNR(+) (KNA(+)) expression. KNA(+) cells had high clonal proliferative potential and specification into endothelial colony-forming cell (ECFCs) phenotype. KNA(+) cells differentiated into perfused blood vessels when implanted subcutaneously into the flank of nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient mice and when injected into the vitreous of type 2 diabetic mice (db/db mice). Transcriptomic analysis showed that differentiation of hiPSCs derived from diabetics into KNA(+) cells was sufficient to change baseline differences in gene expression caused by the diabetic status and reprogram diabetic cells to a pattern similar to KNA(+) cells derived from nondiabetic hiPSCs. Proteomic array studies performed on retinas of db/db mice injected with either control or diabetic donor-derived KNA(+) cells showed correction of aberrant signaling in db/db retinas toward normal healthy retina. These data provide proof of principle that KNA(+) cells restore perfusion and correct vascular dysfunction in db/db mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据