4.8 Review

Dynamical memristors for higher-complexity neuromorphic computing

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 7, 页码 575-591

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41578-022-00434-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Laboratory Directed Research and Development programme at Sandia National Laboratories
  2. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0003525]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0207600]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61925401, 92064004, 2019BD002, 2020BD010]
  5. PKU-Baidu Fund
  6. Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation, Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence
  7. Tencent Foundation through the XPLORER PRIZE
  8. National Science Foundation [CCF-1900675, DMR-1810119]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on electronic devices and materials is driven by the slowdown of transistor scaling and the growth of computing needs. Using devices like memristors to achieve complex dynamics enables new computing architectures with high energy efficiency and computing capacity.
Research on electronic devices and materials is currently driven by both the slowing down of transistor scaling and the exponential growth of computing needs, which make present digital computing increasingly capacity-limited and power-limited. A promising alternative approach consists in performing computing based on intrinsic device dynamics, such that each device functionally replaces elaborate digital circuits, leading to adaptive 'complex computing'. Memristors are a class of devices that naturally embody higher-order dynamics through their internal electrophysical processes. In this Review, we discuss how novel material properties enable complex dynamics and define different orders of complexity in memristor devices and systems. These native complex dynamics at the device level enable new computing architectures, such as brain-inspired neuromorphic systems, which offer both high energy efficiency and high computing capacity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据