4.5 Article

Longitudinal gut virome analysis identifies specific viral signatures that precede necrotizing enterocolitis onset in preterm infants

期刊

NATURE MICROBIOLOGY
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 653-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41564-022-01096-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01HD092311, R00DK107923, R01DK122029, R01HD092414, UH3AI083265, P30DK052574]
  2. Children's Discovery Institute of Washington University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that changes in the viral and bacterial composition of the gut precede the onset of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm infants. The results suggest that the early life virome signatures in preterm infants may play a role in NEC.
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a serious consequence of preterm birth and is often associated with gut bacterial microbiome alterations. However, little is known about the development of the gut virome in preterm infants, or its role in NEC. Here, using metagenomic sequencing, we characterized the DNA gut virome of 9 preterm infants who developed NEC and 14 gestational age-matched preterm infants who did not. Infants were sampled longitudinally before NEC onset over the first 11 weeks of life. We observed substantial interindividual variation in the gut virome between unrelated preterm infants, while intraindividual variation over time was significantly less. We identified viral and bacterial signatures in the gut that preceded NEC onset. Specifically, we observed a convergence towards reduced viral beta diversity over the 10 d before NEC onset, which was driven by specific viral signatures and accompanied by specific viral-bacterial interactions. Our results indicate that bacterial and viral perturbations precede the sudden onset of NEC. These findings suggest that early life virome signatures in preterm infants may be implicated in NEC. Gut virome analysis of preterm infants at risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis identifies a conserved viral signature that precedes disease onset.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据