4.6 Article

Blade-Coatable Hexagonal Boron Nitride Ionogel Electrolytes for Scalable Production of Lithium Metal Batteries

期刊

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 1558-1565

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00535

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF Future Manufacturing Program [CMMI-2037026]
  2. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE1842165]
  3. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology as part of the Center for Hierarchical Materials Design (CHiMaD) [70NANB19H005]
  4. Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource (NSF) [ECCS-1542205, NSF DMR-1720139]
  5. State of Illinois
  6. Materials Research Science and Engineering Center [NSF DMR-1720139]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a blade-coatable hexagonal boron nitride ionogel electrolyte with high ionic conductivity and stability, enabling excellent rate performance in lithium metal batteries.
Solid-state electrolytes have attracted significant attentionfor rechargeable lithium-ion batteries due to their potential to enablehigher energy density technologies and improve cell safety by removingvolatile liquid electrolytes. However, existing solid-state electrolytematerials lack sufficient electrochemical performance or requireexpensive and time-consuming processing methods that have preventedtheir wide-scale adoption. Here, a blade-coatable hexagonal boronnitride ionogel electrolyte is introduced that exhibits high roomtemperature ionic conductivity (>1 mS cm-1), is stable against lithiummetal anodes, and can be applied over a wide area in a thin (<40 mu m)and crack-freefilm. Furthermore, this blade-coatable slurry has a tunableviscosity to enable its use in existing battery manufacturing infra-structure. The resulting blade-coated hBN ionogel electrolyte isemployed in a lithium metal battery with a LiFePO4cathode, exhibiting superlative rate capability at room temperaturewith a 78% capacity retention after 500 cycles at a rate of 1C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据